99¦~06¤ë¸¹ ¹D ªk ªk °T (218)

DEEP & FAR

 

 

¯B¤ô¦L¬y¦æ¯f¾Ç¦]ªGÃö«Y¤§±Òµo

 

±i¬f²W «ß®v

¡D¬Fªv¤j¾Çªk«ß¾Ç¨t¾Ç¤h

¡D¬Fªv¤j¾Çªk«ß¾Ç¬ã¨s©ÒºÓ¤h

¡D«ß®v°ª¦Ò¤Î®æ

 

²Ä¤G¸`¡@¬ü°êªk¤W©Ó»{¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú¤§°ò¥»­ì«h

²Ä¤­¶µ¡@¤pµ²

¦b¬ü°êÁp¨¹ÃÒ¾Úªk¬I¦æ¤§«e¡A¬O§_©Ó»{±M®a©Î¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú¤§¼Ð·Ç¬°Frye­ì«h¡A¥ç§Y¡A¸Ó±M®aÃÒ¾Ú©ÎÃÒ¨¥¬O§_Àò±o¨ä©ÒÄÝ»â°ì¤§´¶¹M±µ¨ü¡CÁp¨¹ÃÒ¾Úªk¨î­q¨Ã¬I¦æ«á¡A¦ü¥G©ñ¼e¤F¹ï¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú¤§©Ó»{¼Ð·Ç¡AÁp¨¹ÃÒ¾Úªk²Ä402±ø³W©wÃÒ¾Ú³Q©Ó»{¤§«e´£¬°¡u¨ã¦³ÃöÁp©Ê¡v¡A¦Pªk²Ä702±ø«h³W©w¡A¨Ì¾Ú¬ì¾Ç©Î±M·~ª¾ÃÑ©Ò¬°¤§·N¨£©ÎÃÒ¨¥¥²¶·¥Ñ¥i¾a¤§­ì«h¤Î¤èªk±À¾É¦Ó¥X¡C¨ä«á©óDaubert®×¤¤¡A³Ì°ªªk°|¸àÄÀÁp¨¹ÃÒ¾Úªk¡A»{¬°¥i³Q©Ó»{¤§ÃÒ¾Ú¥²¶·¦P®É¨ã³ÆÃöÁp©Ê¥H¤Î¥i¾a¡B½T¹ê©Ê¡F³Ì°ªªk°|¨Ã´£¥X¥|¶µ¿Å¶q¥i¾a¡B½T¹ê©Ê¤§°ò·Ç¡A¤À§O¬°ÃÒ¾Ú¬O§_¯à³Q´ú¸Õ¡B¬ã¨s¤èªk¤§¿ù»~¾÷²v¡B²z½×¬O§_¸g¹L¦P¾«¼f®Ö¡B¸Ó±M®a¤§¤èªk¬O§_Àò±o´¶¹M¦a±µ¨ü¡C©óDaubert®×«á¡AÃö©ó¬O§_©Ó»{¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú¸û­«­nªº¨â­Ó§P¨M¤À§O¬OJoiner®×¥H¤ÎKumho®×¡CJoiner®×³Ì°ªªk°|±N¬O§_©Ó»{¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú¤§­«¤ß¸m©óÃöÁp©Ê¤§¤W¡F¦ÓKumho®×¤§³Ì°ªªk°|«h±NDaubert®×¤§ÀËÅç¼Ð·ÇÂX®i¤Î©ó¡u«D¬ì¾Ç¡v¤§±M·~©Î§Þ³NÃÒ¾Ú¡A¨Ã¥B»¡©ú±M®aÃÒ¨¥¬O§_¨ã³Æ¥i¾a©Ê¡A¨ú¨M©ó¨ä¤èªk¬O§_»P¸Ó»â°ì¤º¨ä¥L±M®a±Ä¥Î¤§¤èªk¬Û¤@­P¡C

 

²Ä¤T¸`¡@¬ü°êªk°|¦p¦ó¥H¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú»{©w¦]ªGÃö«Y

¬ì¾ÇÃÒ¾Ú±o¥H¦hºØ§Î¦¡¥X²{¡C¨Ò¦p¡A®i±æ©Êªº¬ã¨s¡B¦^ÅU«¬ªº¬ã¨s¡A¥H°Êª«¬°¬ã¨s«ÈÅé¡B©Î¥H¤H¸s¬°¬ã¨s¹ï¶H¤§¬ã¨s¡AÁ{§ÉÂå®vªºÃÒ¨¥¡B¯f²z¾ÇªºÀËÅç³ø§iµ¥µ¥¡C¬ü°ê³\¦hªk°|»{¬°¡A¬JµM­nµý©ú¤HÃþ¿©±w¯e¯f¡B¨ü¶Ë®`¤§­ì¦]¬°¦ó¡]¦]ªGÃö«Y¡^¡A²zÀ³¨Ï¥Î¥H¤HÃþ¬°¬ã¨s¹ï¶H¤§¬y¦æ¯f¾Ç¬ã¨s¡]Epidemiologic study¡^¡C¦Ó¥B¡A¦b¬ü°ê¡uÀu¶VÃÒ¾Ú­ì«h¡v¡]Proof by a preponderance of the evidence¡^ªº¤ä°t¤U¡A­ì§i¥²¶·µý©ú¨ä¥D±i¨Æ¹ê¬°¯u¤§¥i¯à©Ê¤j©óµê°°¤§¥i¯à©Ê¡]More likely true than not true¡^¡A©Ò¥H­ì§i´£¥X¤§¬y¦æ¯f¾Ç¬ã¨s¥²¶·Åã¥Ü¥X2.0¥H¤Wªº¬Û¹ï¦MÀI«×¡C[1] ¥»¸`²Ä¤@¶µ¡B²Ä¤G¶µ±N°w¹ï¬ü°êªk°|³o¨â¶µ»{©w¼Ð·Ç§@²­nªº»¡©ú¡A¨ÃÄÄ­z¾ÇªÌªº¤£¦P·N¨£¡F¥»¸`ªº²Ä¤T¶µ«h±N¤ÀªR¡A©ó«D¨M©w½×©Î¾÷²vÆ[ÂI¤U¨ã¬Û·í­«­n©Ê¤§¤@¯ë¤Î­Ó§O¦]ªGÃö«Y¤§°ÝÃD¡A¨Ã¶i¦Ó»¡©ú©ó¯A¤Î°ª«×±M·~©Î¬ì¾Çª¾ÃѤ§¤½®`¡BÃÄ®`¡B²£«~¡BÂåÀø¶D³^¤¤¡A­ì§i¦p¦ó¯à°÷¦b­Ó®×¤¤µý©ú¦]ªGÃö«Y¦s¦b¡C

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  



[1]    Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995), at 1320-1322.  DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir. 1990).  Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 947 F. Supp. 1387, 1403 (D. Or. 1996).  In re Breast Implant Litig., 11 F. Supp. 2d. 1217 (D. Colo. 1998).  Sanderson v. International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 950 F. Supp. 981 (c. d. Cal. 1996).