99¦~09¤ë¸¹ ¹D ªk ªk °T (221)

DEEP & FAR

 

 

Dickson Industries, Inc. v. Patent Enforcement Team, L.L.C.
¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°jªk°|ºM¦^¤£·í¦æ¬°¤§§P¨M(Finding of Inequitable Conduct)
By: Thomas McKiernan and Michael Badagliacca

 

ªL ©¾ ±M§Q¤uµ{®v

¡E      ²MµØ¤j¾Ç¤uµ{»P¨t²Î¬ì¾Ç¨t

 

 

¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°jªk°|(Federal Circuit)ºM¾P¬ü°ê«X§J©Ô²ü°¨¦{¦è°Ï(Western District of Oklahoma)¦a¤èªk°|(U.S. District Court)ªº¤£·í¦æ¬°¤§§P¨M(finding of inequitable conduct)¡C

Patent Enforcement Team (PET) ¦b¦A¼f¬d¶¥¬q(reexamination)¤¤ª¾¹D¥B¨S¦³´¦ÅS°Ñ¦Ò¤å¥ó¡C¬°¤F¼W¥[PET¤§±M§Q¦]¤£·í¦æ¬°¦Ó¤£¯à°õ¦æªº¥D±i¡A¦b¦a¤èªk°|«e¡ADicksonÁn½Ð­ã¤©´£¥X²Ä¤G¦¸­×¥¿¶Dª¬(Motion to Leave to File Second Amended Complaint)¡C¦a¤èªk°|§_¨M¤FDicksonªº½Ð¨D¡CPET´£¥X¤F°w¹ï¦³®Ä©Êªº³¡¥÷²©ö§P¨M½Ð¨D(Partial Summary Judgement on Validity)¡A¦ÓDicksonÂǥѪ§½×¨tª§±M§Q(underlying patent)¦]¦b¦A¼f¬d¶¥¬q¤¤ªº¤£·í¦æ¬°¦Ó¤£¯à°õ¦æ¨Ó¦^À³¡CPET´£¥X¤Fªì´ÁÁn½Ð(Motions in Limine)¥H±NÃö©ó¤£·í¦æ¬°ªºÃҾڱư£¦b¥~¡C°ò©óDickson½Ð¨Dªº§_¨M¡APET°µ¥X¤F¤£·í¦æ¬°¤£·|¦¨¬°ª§Ä³ªºµ²½×¡A¥BPET¥D±i¨ä¥¼·Ç³Æ¤£·í¦æ¬°Ä³ÃDªº¼f²z¡C¦a¤èªk°|§_¨M¤Fªì´ÁÁn½Ð¡A¨Ã¹ïPET°µ¥X¤£·í¦æ¬°¤§§P¨M¡C

¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°jªk°|ºM¾P¦a¤èªk°|ªº¤£·í¦æ¬°¤§§P¨M¡C¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°jªk°|»{¬°¡A¦a¤èªk°|©Ò°µ¥Xªº¤£¤@­P©R¥O(inconsistent orders)©Úµ´µ¹PET¦b¼f§P¤¤°w¹ï¤£·í¦æ¬°ªº¾A·íÅGÅ@¾÷·|¡C¦]¬°PET¨Ã¨S¦³±o¨ì´£¨Ñµ½·NÃÒ¾Ú(good faith evidence)ªº¾÷·|¥H¤Ï¹ï¡§PET·N¹Ï´ÛÄF¬ü°ê±M§Q°Ó¼Ð§½(USPTO)¡¨ªºµ²½×¡A©Ò¥HPETªºÅv¯q¨ü¨ì·l®`¡C¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°jªk°|±j½Õ¤U¯Å¦a¤èªk°|¶·¦³¥²­nªºª`·N¡A¥H½T«O±M§QÅv¤H²Å¦XÃö©óÃÒ©ú¤£·í¦æ¬°ªºÁ|ÃÒ³d¥ô¡C

¹ê°È«Øij¡GRule 37 C.F.R. ¡±1.156 (Rule 56)³W©wµ½·Nªº¸q°ÈÀ³ÄÝ©ó¬ü°ê±M§Q°Ó¼Ð§½ºÉ¤§¡A¤£¶È±M§Q«ß®v¡A§Yµo©ú¤H¤Î¥ô¦ó·Ç³Æ©Î°õ¦æ±M§Q¥Ó½Ðªº¥N²z¤H¡A¬Ò¦³¾A¥Î¡C¥þ³¡³£¦³¸q°È¦V¬ü°ê±M§Q°Ó¼Ð§½´¦ÅSÃö©ó¥i±M§Q©Ê­«¤jªº¸ê°T¡C¦pªG¦¹³W©w¨S¦³³Q¿í¦u¡A«h¥i³y¦¨±M§QµLªk°õ¦æ¡A¥B¦b¶D³^¹Lµ{¤¤¡A¥i¯à¥²¶·¤ä¥I¹ï¤è«ß®v¶O¥Î¡C