101¦~9¤ë¸¹ ¹D ªk ªk °T (245)

DEEP & FAR

 

 

¬ü°ê³Ì°ªªk°|µô¨M
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership¡G
¥Î©óÃÒ©ú±M§QµL®Ä¥ß³õªº©ú½T
¥B¥O¤H«HªAªº¼Ð·Ç

 

§d©É¬À ±M§Q¤@²Õ°Æ¥D¥ô

¡P ¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¶éÃÀ¾Ç¨t

¡P ¥xÆW¤j¾Ç´Óª«¬ì¾Ç¬ã¨s©Ò

 

 

¦b¥@¬É¦U¦a±M§Q±q·~¤H­û¤Î±M§QÅv¤H®ï¤Á¹w´Áªº§P¨M¤¤¡A¬ü°ê³Ì°ªªk°|ºû«ù¬ü°êÁp¨¹¨µ°j¤W¶Dªk°|¹ïi4i Limited Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.(·L³n¤½¥q)ªº§P¨M¡A598 F.3d 831(Fed. Cir. 2010)¡C³Ì°ªªk°|ªº·N¨£½T»{Âǥѩú½T¥B¥O¤H«HªAªºÃҾڨӫإ߬ü°ê±M§QµL®Äªºªø´Á¿í´`¼Ð·Ç¡C³Ì°ªªk°|ªºµô©w¬O¥H±M§Qªk²Ä282±ø(¬ü°êªk²Ä35¸¹)¬°«e´£¡A±M§Qªk²Ä282±ø³W©w¡u¤@±M§Q³Q°²©w¬°¦³®Ä¡v¥H¤Î¡u«Ø¥ßµL®Äªº³d¥ô¡KÀ³¸¨¦b¥D±iµL®Äªº¤@¤è¡v¡C¦¹ªk«ß¤Wªº°²³]¾A¥Î©ó©Ò¦³¤½§iªº¬ü°ê±M§Q¡A¨Ã­±Á{Âǥѭn¨D¼W°ªªºÃÒ©ú¼Ð·Ç¨Ó´M¨D¨Ï³o¼Ë¤@­Ó±M§QµL®Äªº¨º¨Ç¤H¡C

§@¬°°ò¦ªºª§½×¬OÃö©ó2007¦~i4i±±§i·L³nªº±M§Q«IÅv¶D³^¡A¸Ó±M§Q²[»\½s¿è¤å¥óªº§ï¨}¤èªk¡C¦b¬ü°êªF¼w¦{¦a¤èªk°|¡A·L³n®Ú¾Ú¬ü°ê±M§Qªk²Ä102±ø¡]b¡^ªº¾P°â»Ùê(on-sale bar)¤Ï¶D©Ò¥D±iªºi4i±M§QµL®Ä¡A©Ò­z¾P°â»Ùê±Æ°£¦b¥Ó½Ð±M§Q«e¦b¬ü°ê³c°â¶W¹L¤@¦~ªºµo©ú³Q±M§Q¡C·L³nª§ÅG(1)«Ø¥ßµL®Äªº³d¥ôÀ³¬°¸û§CÀu¶ÕÃÒ¾Ú¡]preponderance of the evidence¡^¼Ð·Ç¡A¥H¤Î(2)¸Ó¸û§C¼Ð·ÇÀ³©ú½T¦a¾A¥Î©ó¦¹®×¨Ò¡A¦]¬°¬ü°ê±M§Q°Ó¼Ð§½(USPTO)¨Ã¥¼¦Ò¶q¨ä®Ú¾Ú²Ä102±ø¡]b¡^±øµL®Ä§ðÀ»ªº¸ÓÃÒ¾Ú¡C¦a¤èªk°|(Leonard Davis ªk©x)»é¦^·L³n¤§¥ß³õ¡C³­¼f¹Î»{©w·L³n¬G·N«I¥Ç¸Ó±M§Q¥B¸Ó±M§Q¨Ã«DµL®Ä¡C

 

¡]«ÝÄò¡^